 |
| CorbinPartners’ summer intern, Samantha Schreiber, Osgoode Hall law student, writes about the hot dog wars in “Dare to Compare Part II”. |
 |
| Ruth Corbin accepts two MRIA Awards of Excellence on behalf of the Department of Justice and Mount Sinai Hospital for projects managed by CorbinPartners Inc. |
 |
| Dr. Corbin photographed with Dr. Heather Munroe-Blum, President of McGill University at McGill’s Alumni Stewardship Reception in Toronto. |
 |
| Ruth Corbin and Brian Mulroney discuss his biography at a Cassels Brock event in September 2007. |
|
Home  Media & Publications
|
Truly excellent…This thorough, well-researched and well-written guide is what the legal profession has been waiting for. It is a solid and timely analysis from the recognized experts in the field of law and cognitive sciences – a cannot do without tool for any litigator considering the use of survey evidence.
Colleen Spring Zimmerman
Partner, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
Your article in the March issue of Vue Magazine was very useful. I found your use of examples to demonstrate the difference between various concepts in market research were excellent! They will be valuable in explaining these nuances to our clients.
Mary Lou Mendro
Probe Research Inc.
2006
2005
Is there a method to the madness? The Persisting Controversy of Patenting Business Methods
Corbin, R., Cheung T.
Intellectual Property Journal, 2005, Vol. 19 (1), pp. 29-81
2004
There are some things money can’t buy. For everything else there are damages. Proof of Irreparable Harm in Canadian Practice.
The Trademark Reporter, 2004, November-December, Vol. 94, pp. 1294-1314
Pulling Surveys back from the Illusory Brink: a Reply to Liefeld
Corbin, R., Morrow D.
The Trademark Reporter, 2004, November-December, Vol. 94 (6), pp. 1372-1388
When Confusion Surveys Collide: Poor Designs or Good Science?
Corbin, R., Renaud, A.
The Trademark Reporter, 2004, July-August, Vol. 94 (4), pp. 781-799
Intent to Deceive: the Role it plays in Passing Off Actions
Corbin, R., Renaud, A.
Intellectual Property Journal, 2004, Vol. 18 (1), pp. 97-108
2003
What’s good for the goose is bad for the gander. Why confusion surveys by plaintiff and defendant should be different
Intellectual Property Journal, 2003, Vol. 16 (2), pp. 177-194
2000
Trial By Survey: Survey Evidence, and the Law
Corbin, R., Gill, K., and Jolliffe, S.
2000
Product Containers Take Flight from Packaging
Intellectual Property Journal, 2000, Vol. 14, pp. 363-377/p>
Survey Research Goes to Court
In C. Chakrapani (ed.)
Marketing Research: State of the Art Perspectives, American Marketing Association, 2000, pp. 583-626
1999
The History of Survey Evidence in North American Litigation: From Admissibility to Weight
Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 1999, Vol. 18, pp. 79-86
1997
Evidence of Irreparable Harm in Interlocutory Injunction Applications
Canadian Patent Reporter, 1997, Vol. 74, pp. 289-306
Market Research and Surveys as Expert Evidence
In Freiman, M. and Berenblut, M. (eds.)
The Litigator’s Guide to Expert Witnesses, 1997, pp. 55-77
1996
Taking Legal Action to Stop Competitors in their Tracks
Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 1996, Vol. 15, pp. 66-73
Survey Research in Litigation: its past successes, its future trials
Canadian Patent Reporter, 1995, November, pp. 215-247
1995
Social Science Evidence in Misleading Advertising
Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 1995, Vol. 14, pp. 57-65
1992
Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviours
Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 1992
|
|
